Sıra | DOSYA ADI | Format | Bağlantı |
---|---|---|---|
01. | Consulting Project Assuranc | ppt | Sunumu İndir |
Transkript
peruc o n s u l t i n gPeruProgramme Assurance Method
© Peru Consulting 2014Our Programme Assurance method provides clear focusSlide 2Business ObjectivesCost/Time/ QualitySourcing / SuppliersTechnologyProcessPeopleRelation-shipsProgrammeAssurance
© Peru Consulting 2014 Using a simple, clear, tried and tested methodology. Emphasising the key risk areas likely to impact project delivery: Project – Requirements against quality and timescales, and by implication budget. People – Governance & structure, Relationships, skills and availability. Process – Methods, and quality assurance. Environment – Technology, Tools and the external environment. Rapidly highlighting risks, issues and hidden dependencies that could impact success whilst defining pragmatic actions to resolve them. Covering the breadth of the programme whilst allowing drill down on specific areas when issues are detected. Linking with project delivery benchmarks to provide meaningful metrics around cost, time and remaining effort.We provide a practical assessment based on experienceSlide 3
© Peru Consulting 2014Whilst making use of proven methodsSlide 4
© Peru Consulting 2014Overcoming barriers to changeSlide 5
© Peru Consulting 2014Our overall Assurance processSlide 6Agree termsof referenceInterview key staffDocument & data reviewSite visitsAnalysis ActionPeru &external data
© Peru Consulting 2014Our Assurance is both broad and deepSlide 7ProjectScope & RequirementsDeliveryTimescaleQualityRequiredCostPeopleOrganisation& StructureMotivation& FocusSkills &ExperienceNumber &AvailabilityA Project is delivered......by people & teams......using processes......onto an environment.
© Peru Consulting 2014Example high level output is shown belowSlide 8ProjectScope& RequirementsDeliveryTimescaleQualityRequiredCostPeopleOrganisation& StructureMotivation& FocusSkills &ExperienceNumber &AvailabilityProcessesStakeholder ManagementQAMethods & StandardsProjectManagement• Timescales aggressive given level of staff skills and number, otherwise fine.• Already one month behind, can be recovered but needs project governance to be strengthened .• Critical: Staff resources approx 20%less than expected to meet dates.• Critical: Staff have no previous experience of development tools or application set.• Processes as expected on a project of this size and complexity.• No changes required.• Some external supplier risks. Mitigation Plan is attached.• No urgent work required here.
© Peru Consulting 2014Outputs from the assessmentSlide 9 Report content: Overall Health Assessment Dashboard Health Check Governance Themes Spreadsheet results Areas of Concern Recommended Actions Agreed Action Plan Learning Points
peruc o n s u l t i n gTrusted. Independent. Experts.